Good News at Beef Empire Days
The Grand Champion Steer and Grand Champion Heifer were sired by Green Garden Bulls out of females sired by Gardens Profit.
Good News at Beef Empire Days 2004
Congratulations to the Hays Beef Research Center for having Grand Champion Carcass Steer, Reserve Champion Carcass Steer, and Grand Champion Carcass Heifer, and their over all good placing.
Grand Champion Carcass Steer was sired AI by Gardens Bravo. His dam was a Gardens Profit daughter.
| Live Wt. | Hot Carcass Wt. | Back Fat | Ribeye Area | Yield Grade | Marbling Score | Quality Grade |
| 1286 | 771 | .4 | 12.96 | 2.78 | SLAB40 | PR- |
Grand Champion Carcass Heifer was sired by AI by Gardens Matrix. Her dam was a Gardens Profit daughter.
BEST of BREED
Good News - for the News! Congratulations to Brandon New on having the Grand Champion Carcass Steer at the 2001 National Jr. Heifer Show in Denver this summer. His 1st place steer weighed 1193, with .20 backfat, had a 13.1 ribeye, a yield grade of 1.77 and a quality grade of Prime (SLAB 10). Brandons 2nd entry weighed 1167, had a 12.3 ribeye, with .2 backfat and a yield grade 2.04 and graded average choice (MT 30) and stood 10th overall. Both steers were sired by Gardens Opto. Good News at Beef Empire Days Steers sired by Green Garden bulls placed 1st, 10th, 11th, and 19th at the 2001 Beef Empire Days Carcass Contest in Garden City.The winner of the Carcass Contest was sired by Gardens Perfection 719, currently being used at the Light Ranch, in Turpin, Ok. His live weight was 1244, with a ribeye area of 14.8, a marbling score of 7.0 with .36 inches of backfat. He was a yield grade 2.0 and graded high choice.
These steers were part of an ongoing carcass comparison study being done at the KSU Agricultural Research Center, in Hays, KS. involving genetics from Green Garden Angus. This study is being done using a mixed breed cowherd that averaged about 50% Angus while the rest were predominately Simmental and a little Brahman. A more detailed analysis of this data is listed below.
Report on EPD data for steer calves from Green Garden bullsJohn Brethour
KSU Agricultural Research Center Hays, Kansas
This report summarizes an analysis of the data obtained on 47 steer calves produced from semen from Green Gardens Angus. There were three test bulls An0010 - Gardens Perfection 719, An0052 - Gardens Highmark, AN0053 - Gardens Bravo and one reference bull 1123 - SC OB45. The semen was randomly assigned to the station cowherd during the 1999 breeding season. This is a typical mixed breed cowherd that averaged about 50% Angus, while the rest was predominately Simmental and a little Brahman.
The overall carcass performance of the
calves was phenomenal. After regrading by USDA graders only one steer graded Select and 32
head (68%) were CAB or Prime (6 head Prime). The ultrasound evaluations made during the
feeding phase projected the exceptional carcass quality and 4 head were entered in the
Garden City Beef Empire Days carcass contest. One steer was champion steer carcass and the
other three placed (10th, 11th and 19th). There was one steer marked YG #4 on the IBP
payment invoice but that appears a mistake because his calculated yield grade was only
3.0. 24 (51%)assigned USDA yield grade #2 but 29 (62%) had a calculated yield grade of 2
or better.
The cattle were harvested in two
groups, May 16 and June 20. This procedure exploited ultrasound technology to enable each
animal to fulfill his maximum potential without becoming too fat. The 4 head sent to the
carcass show were slaughtered June 14 and are considered contemporary to those harvested
June 20.
Least square means are presented in a
table titled Means corrected for age of calf, harvest date, and percent Angus in the
dam, which summarizes the model used. The
first column in the table is the reference sire 1123. The standard error of the mean
appears in the last column. Only if means differ by twice this value should the
differences be considered important.
Birth weights of the calves of the test
sires were larger, but no calving difficulty was encountered. Weaning weights were
corrected for age using the regression model which indicated a 2.7-pound increase for each
day of age. Yearling weights were
interpolated to exactly 365 days using the weights taken January 18 and April 12.
Some data was missing among the carcass
measures and was estimated from the final grade sheet and are indicated in red on the
spreadsheet. Steer 108 would have been CAB had he been black hided.
A more accurate method of data
collection was devised by targeting yield grade 2.9 instead of .4 inch backfat because
that enabled including ribeye area and percent KPH fat in the index. Those calculations
are also shown on the spreadsheets and summarized in the tables.
The results of these procedures reveal
some exciting information about two of the test bulls, AN0010 and AN0052. They produced
muscular, high growth and yet high quality calves. Note that the final adjusted carcass
weight using this procedure is nearly 100 pounds more than the reference sire and equaling
or nearly equaling the quality grade at that end point.
In conclusion, all the progeny produced
in this study performed exceptionally well. But the detailed analyses that two of the test
bulls appear to have superior genetics that will be very beneficial to the industry.
| Sire | 1123 - SC OB45 | AN0010-Perfection 719 | AN0052 - Highmark | AN0053 - Bravo |
| Number of calves | 12 |
16 | 14 | 5 |
| Weaning Weight | 553 |
572 | 595 | 594 |
| Yearling Weight | 950 |
1006 | 1032 | 993 |
| Carcass Weight | 787 |
833 | 873 | 804 |
| Dressing Percent | 64.35 | 64.62 | 65.18 | 64.54 |
| Backfat in inches | .48 | .42 | .46 | .51 |
| Marbling Score | 6.61 | 6.36 | 5.90 | 5.34 |
| Rib Eye Area | 13.39 | 14.14 | 15.13 | 13.11 |
| USDA Yield Grade | 2.85 | 2.37 | 2.20 | 2.63 |
| Carcass Weight at .4 in backfat | 749 | 830 | 845 | 756 |
| Marbling score at .4 inch backfat | 6.32 | 6.33 | 5.70 | 5.09 |
| Carcass weight at YG 2.9 | 783 | 859 | 907 | 760 |
| Marbling Score at YG 2.9 | 6.56 | 6.58 | 6.19 | 5.18 |
| Average weaning weight | 520 | 576 | ||
| Average yearling weight | 863 | 998 | ||
| Average weight at harvest | 1239 | 1335 | ||
| Average age at harvest | 508 | 474 | ||
| Average carcass weight | 776 | 830 | ||
| Carcass weight per day of age | 1.54 | 1.75 | ||
| Average marbling score | 5.37 | 6.18 | ||
| Average backfat, in | 0.37 | 0.46 | ||
| Average REA, sq in | 13.8 | 14.1 | ||
| Carcass yield grade | ||||
| YG#1 | 29.17% | 4.26% | ||
| YG#2 | 58.33% | 46.81% | ||
| YG#3 | 12.50% | 46.81% | ||
| YG#4 | 2.13% | |||
| Carcass quality grade | ||||
| Prime | 12.77% | |||
| CAB | 50.00% | 55.32% | ||
| Choice | 20.83% | 29.79% | ||
| Select | 29.17% | 2.13% | ||
| Notes | ||||
| 1. 10 (42%) of the Wagyu calves were from 2-yr heifers and were born | ||||
| earlier (11 days). No weaning weight adjustment was made | ||||
| 2. Cattle were sorted for marketing so that backfat would average .4 in | ||||
| and that carcass weights would not exceed 950 pounds. | ||||
| However, some Wagyu steers did not attain those specifications and were | ||||
| sold September 6. This partially accounts for the lower yield grades | ||||
| among the Wagyu. | ||||
| 3. Carcass weight per day of age is a very important comparison. The | ||||
| difference between 1.54 and 1.75 pounds per day of age can be | ||||
| translated to $.24 per day in relative profitability. | ||||
For information Call, Mail or email to the respective addresses below.
Green Garden Angus
1356 AVE M
ELLSWORTH KS 67439
PH:(785) 472-3752
E-Mail: janssen@grapevine.net